The team with the most points wins.

I would like to see people be able to go there to have fun, experience games, without being intimidated by brainy, competitive people.

There are 84 people. These are randomly divided into four teams of 20 players and one spare. Spares are there in case someone doesn't show up. Spares are strongly encouraged to be leaders.

OG games on the site and not on the site, traditionals, and some commercial games. Mostly not-too-heavy abstract strategy, but also a grab bag of other types. Before the tournament players indicate their preferred games so that almost everything can be scheduled in advance.

Atlantis Chess. Let's wave a magic wand and say Drinkin' Dragons is completed and good. Safari Race, for ~ four players with cards and glass pieces, is not on the site, and neither is five-player Attention. Date Square, King of the Mountain, Sailboat and Thunderbird are not on the site. Don't forget Better Letter.

This is more about facilitating communication flows than leading. There is an overall team leader, the hero leader, the mystery games leader, and the Triple Threat leader.

First day, morning. Players do not know which team they are on, although points go to the team. Emphasis on multiplayer games, for two reasons. Prevents collusion among players on the same team, e.g. Stand By Me. Meet people so you know someone when teams are established. At the end of the morning teams are established, mystery games are revealed, and things start to get stitched together.
First day, afternoon. Normal. The usual suspects games, your Yoté, Runners, The Royal Game of Ur, but some variety too.

Second day. Normal.

Fallow, no events. Some space to prepare and practise for the next day. Maybe clean up the mess from some availability problems from earlier.

Fourth day, morning. An hour earlier than everyone else there are the hero games, so there is no scheduling conflict. Then mystery games and then Triple Threat. Triple Threat is a good team activity :-) but maybe awkward for this :-( as discussed elsewhere. Other games in there.
Fourth day, afternoon. Individual games and demonstration games. It all ends with revealing winners and distributing prizes.

Champion might be a more appropriate word. During the tournament, each team decides which player will play a specified game. A couple of hero games. What could be played? Extra points makes sense.

Before the tournament players may sign up for a mystery game, and find out what it is early in the competition. Some of these are the less visible OG games.

A subset of these is a group of players who play a group of games, where players choose who will play which game.
Five games from the GIPF project.
Four modern big games: Hive, Tak, Onitama, Shobu.
It's for all the marbles. The superior group gets the points for all these games, while the inferior group gets no points for these (yes, ties are possible).

Teams do not benefit from players winning these games. A set of players would play, e.g. konane, and are eliminated until you have one winner (and someone in second). Konane, fanorona, Atlantis Chess..

People sign up to play a certain game at a certain time. But there is a relaxed looseness to every aspect of this. Just a bit of fun, with a touch of spectacle. What could be played?

Well that's a whole topic.

Prizes bend toward a theme for a tournament, as do a minority of the games. A tournament could be Canadian, Caribbean(/South American), European, or (East) Asian.